
India: individual versus the system
January 24, 2007A commonly highlighted predicament faced by individuals from our society is that individuals are capable of achieving many positive accomplishments as well as scaling newer heights, but the ’system’ does not allow any such growth. The question to be asked is, how true is the supposition that this so called ’system’ is independent of the entity of the said individual.
A society as a whole has a different set of parameters with which it can be judged, measured and understood, compared to that of the individuals that comprises the system; something akin to the macroscopic and microscopic description of a statistical ensemble of physical particles. To state it more articulately, the society has its macrocosmic existential characteristics, which might differ considerably from any particular individual. It is the average value that determines the society, and any statistical parameter can not be applied to any individual member belonging to the collection. But, for any statistical system, it is very rare and difficult for any individual entity to go beyond the three sigma, a measure of divergence from the average value. Translated to the social system, this implies that an individual can at best accomplish a few times the average value of the accomplishments of his fellow beings, but the performance of society is determined by the overwhelming majority. The key here is the ‘overwhelming majority’, which is comprised of individuals! It is the microscopic property of the majority that determines the macroscopic features.
In a lifeless physical system, an external source is needed to add energy to the system, to lift the average value. For a living social ensemble also the dominant factor of social evolution is exposure to external cultures; but in addition there is the inherent urge of human beings to seek, learn and explore that causes the individuals to seek new goals, and slowly the rest catch up with the said individual who had that uncontrolled urge to break through the fetters of social conditioning. Every individual goes through this phase in certain phases of their lives when they have the urge to break the shackles and go beyond the average value, but in the case of ‘overwhelming majority’ the already prevalent conditions overwhelm the individuals and they cower back in to the shell of mediocrity and conservativeness. And this causes the ’system’ to curb the ambitions of the individuals. Effectively, it is the collection of individuals who had failed earlier to curve a path for themselves who effect the vicious circle of the ’system’.
Is there a way out to break free of this vicious circle? What effect does an individual have on the system? History teaches that all path-breaking evolution or revolution, be it social, philosophical or scientific, were brought about by single individuals who made the society slowly follow their path. As an example one may cite the Amul cooperative movement spearheaded by Verghese Kurien, or more recently, the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh created by Mohd. Yunus, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace last year. But this individualistic approach is a very inefficient mode to move forward and can very often lead to failure, as exemplified by the massively botched up revolt of 1857 against the British dominance which ended in dire failure as it constituted of a few individuals trying to fan the nationalistic fervour in vain, without any collective consciousness! The collective consciousness, if awakened will lead to fulfillment of life of the society as a whole, and a majority of individuals taking positive, even if small, steps will uplift the average value. The ’system’ will be working for the enterprising individual if the majority make small advances, then we will not depend on genius individuals to chart a path for the rest to follow. This, is the essence of democracy!
The realization of the fact that the ’system’ is built up of individuals and if the system is working against any positive individuals then we all have to bear the burden of our collective responsibility, needs to be instilled and cultivated. Each individual of our society, no matter how much reasonable or successful they may appear to be, have to make conscious efforts to change the approach to our lives, take small steps towards positivity, and that and only that will change the system. We are yet to understand the implications of democracy, the sooner we learn the better.
